Gul Panag Mocks Pakistan For Celebrating IMF Loan: ‘We Don’t Need It, You Do’

“Gul Panag’s Brutal Takedown After Pakistan Celebrates IMF Loan: ‘We Haven’t Needed One Since 1993′”

India’s Financial Independence vs. Pakistan’s Dependence on IMF Bailouts!
In a harsh retort to the Pakistani newsman eulogizing Pakistan’s latest IMF loan approval, Panag went on to remind everyone about how India remained financially resilient against Pakistan, which had more than once depended on IMF bailouts for rescue.

What Sparked the Debate? Pakistani journalist Shahbaz Rana took to X (Twitter) to announce that the IMF had approved $1 billion as a tranche of a loan to Pakistan and that it was a “humiliating defeat for India.” He alleged that India had tried and failed to block the IMF’s decision-the opposition to which Gul Panag quickly destroyed.

Gul Panag Pays Back with Anger

In her trademark sarcastic style, Gul Panag quote-tweeted Rana’s post, writing:

“Sir, congratulations on another loan. With respect, we don’t need that money. You do. FYI, we have not taken any financial assistance from the IMF since 1993. Repayments of all the loans taken from the International Monetary Fund were completed on 31 May, 2000.”

Her tweet went viral, resonating with netizens who pointed out the irony of celebrating yet another IMF bailout while neighboring India has maintained financial independence for decades.

READ MORE-Air strike attempt by Pakistan thwarted over Sirsa in Haryana

IMF Loan to Pakistan: A Temporary Fix?
The 1 billion disbursement is part of Pakistan’s 3 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF) with the IMF to stabilize its floundering economy. While the loan is a relief to Pakistan in the short term, the long-term economic issues of Pakistan-including debt sustainability, inflation, and fiscal deficits-are far from being resolved.
Performance Record of Strong Economies
Last time India looked for IMF support was in 1993 and since then, by 2000, it had cleared all its dues. The Indian economy has undergone an explosive rating since then to become the world’s fifth-largest economy, with handsome foreign reserves and a strong system.

FAQs: Gul Panag Mocks Pakistan For Celebrating IMF Loan

1. Gul Panag Mocked Pakistan over IMF loan?
   Gul Panag responded to a comment by Pakistani journalist Shahbaz Rana, where he said that $1 billion IMF loan approval for Pakistan was a “humiliating defeat for India;” she talked about Pakistan’s economic distress against India’s freedom from IMF since 1993.
2. How many loans has the IMF given to Pakistan till now?
   Pakistan remains one of the most recurrent IMF borrowers, having sought bailouts 22 times since the 1980s. The last one was the 3 billion Extended Fund Facility approved in 2023, with a 1 billion tranche disbursed in 2024.
3. When was the last time India had to resort to IMF for a loan?
   India’s last resort to the IMF for assistance was during the balance of payments crisis of 1991. India cleared its dues fully by the year 2000 and since then has been without any assistance from IMF thus financially on its own from thereon.
4. What kind of strings are attached to Pakistan’s IMF loan?
   The IMF attaches conditions of austerity, which may include the following: Increased taxes to increase government revenue Reduced subsidies (fuel, electricity) Selling of the state-owned entities Tightening of the monetary policy to control inflation
5. What keeps Pakistan needing IMF bailouts?
   The economic instability in Pakistan comes from: Low tax revenue (one of the lowest tax-to-GDP ratios in the world) Big military expenditure (getting in funds from development)

Key takeaways
Pakistan’s latest IMF loan reflects on its prevailing economic instability.
Present Indian independence since 1993 indicates the Indian economic strength.
Gul Panag’s viral clapback reminds the two countries’ economic health standing in stark contrast.

Final Words
As Pakistan celebrates yet one more deal with IMF, India’s self-sufficiency speaks volumes of its economic policy and growth pathway. The question itself broaches the issue of sustainable economic reforms vis-à-vis short-term financial fixes.